Slaughterhouse-5 Satire-based Roundtable

Slaughterhouse-Five Response Guide

Satire – combines a critical attitude with wit and humor to improve society.

            Forget the Tralfamadorians.  Don’t bother your head considerably about their conceptions of time.  That stuff is all low-grade science fiction.  The heart of the novel, and what makes Vonnegut an Important Author (I do believe that people will be studying him in 100 years), is his satire.

            On the blogpage, I want to see five different entries from each of you.  They should be short.  Identify a passage.  Quote it entirely, or if it’s a little longer, identify it by page, and by the opening and closing of the passage.  [“I have told my sons. . .  machinery like that”  p. 19].  Then your response, 25 words or fewer.  Pick quotations that reflect Vonnegut’s view of the human condition.

            Of the five entries, three should be of the Quotation-Comment type.  Two should be responses to other people’s entries.  Each will count for up to five points.

            The portal closes: 6:00 p.m., EDT, Sunday, March 30, 2014.

Local Hero Round Table

Please read over the various materials I have given you to help prepare you for the paper ahead.  Use the

comments section to toss around some ideas.  I've given you a bunch of my insights; do you have some of your own?  How about questions?  Anything you're trying to puzzle out?  And please feel free to respond to earlier entries.  

Oh!  Thoughts about "The World Is Too Much With Us" also welcome!

Rethinking School

Read the article "Would You Send Your Kids to a School Where Students Make the Rules?"

Comment below.  Please feel free to response (in a friendly and collegial manner ) to your classmates.  And check back after the assignment is done, as I may comment on some of your comments.

New Frontiers in Warfare

Before I began my boycott of professional football -- I'm still on the fence as regards the college game -- I would see these advertisements during the games for a video game named Call of Duty.  Personally, I find "games" where you "kill people" appalling.  But both my sons have killed thousands upon thousands of people -- I'm sure some of you have, too (girls, is it possible?) -- and they are both kind, sensitive young men.

But now you can actually kill actual people, remotely, on screen.  And that worries me -- That it will make killing to easy, too antiseptic.  So I guess that I'm heartened, if somewhat disturbed, by an article that recently appeared in GQ (of all places): "Confessions of a Drone Warrior".

It's the future of warfare, I suppose. But it comes at a price.  Are you prepared to pay it?  (Or, let somebody else pay for it while we reap the benefits?

George Orwell on Language

More specifically, an essay called "Politics and the English Language".  Orwell considers how people manipulate language in order to manipulate you.  And he has some advice for you in case you want to speak clearly and honestly and truthfully.

Please respond to the essay below (or respond to the responses to the essay).

"Living with Less"

Welcome back, class.  I like the idea of sharing assignments.  Why should I be the only one to benefit from your insights?

This article ties in with Local Hero, specifically with Ben Knox, the old man who lives on the beach.

Read the article (you can access it over on Edmodo.  Your group is "Block 4 English -- Fall 2013".  Your log-in code is: cpxann.)

Then comment here.  You can respond to the article generally, or do it lectio fashion -- start with a particular quotation to which you are responding.

How This Works

Well, you've gotten this far, which is the first step.

As you proceed with your reading, I'd like you to leave some comments. Scroll down the page until you come to the book you're reading. Click on "Comments" at the end. Leave your comment. I'll look in occasionally, but what this should be is a place for you to meet and share ideas with your classmates.  Be sure to leave your name when you blog.

I expect everyone to post at least once for each book. That's the minimum. That will get you 37/50 (or less if your entries are extremely brief). The more entries you make, the more involved you are, the higher your score will be.  The people who get 50/50 are doing it for the fun of the exchanges, not for the grade.

Entries will not be accepted after 12 midnight on Tuesday, August 27th  (the night before the first day of school).

That's the easy part, the fun part. Now for the more difficult assignment (that's why they call it honors): a Formal Academic Essay (aka the "Five-Paragraph Essay"). Think 3-5 pages. If you need a refresher on the five-paragraph essay, go to my THS webpage for the necessary materials.

Suggested topics: Here are a few suggestions. Remember, these are only topics. You will need to narrow them down to find your particular thesis.

A)  The Importance of Faith in In the Beauty of the Lilies.      

Faith is what you believe in, where you find the guiding principles of your life.  It often is tied to God and religion, but it doesn't have to be.  You can have faith in science, faith in individuals, faith in systems.

For this paper, examine the role of faith in each of the four generations of the Wilmot family.  (That should provide a simple basic structure for your paper.  But you'll have to dig and think to come to your understanding of the topic.)

B)  The Doomed Relationship in A Moon for the Misbegotten.

          Jim loves Josie.  He sees through her pose of promiscuity; he is not put off by her size or looks.  And Josie loves Jim.  She can tolerate his womanizing, his drinking, his self-loathing.  Yet at the end of the play Jim walks away, and Josie doesn't try to stop him.

 Why is that?  Why does it have to be, given what we're told about the characters?  To write this, one reading will not be enough.  Make sure you have your facts straight.  What's Josie's father's role in all of this?  What exactly happened with Jim, and his mother, and the woman on the train?  What is the nature of the guilt which Jim can't seem to shake?  What would the future hold, if Josie decided that there could be a future for the two?

C)  Strong Women, Weak Men

 This seems to be the case in both A Moon for the Misbegotten and In the Beauty of the Lilies.  Mike Hogan, then Phil, then Jim in Moon.  And then there's Josie.  Clarence, Teddy, and Clark, in Lilies.  Then there's Stella, Emily, and Essie/Alma.  Not until Jesse comes into the story do we find a strong male figure (and look how that works out).

 That's a theme, but too broad to be a thesis one can build a paper on.  So you'll have to narrow down.  Is there a particular reason for the weakness in men.  The strength of the women?  Is this the result of a changing century, or the cause of a changing century?  Are men abdicating their positions of power, or are women usurping them?

 You may focus on one or both of the works.  Either way, don't try to fit too much in.  Less is often more. 

The Essay will be due no later than 3:00 p.m., Friday, August 30th.  (This applies whether you have English first semester or second – so don’t give me that.)  It may be turned in early at: jmacarthur@tolland.k12.ct.us